Saba Mahmood
Sprawczość to nie tylko opór wobec norm: kobiety z kairskiego ruchu meczetowego realizują ją przez kultywowanie cnót, a świecki feminizm musi to zrozumieć, zanim zacznie osądzać.
Umiejscowienie
Antropolożka z Berkeley, urodzona w Pakistanie, której badanie ruchu kobiecych meczetów w Kairze, „Politics of Piety” (2005), zażądało od teorii liberalnej i feministycznej, by rozumiała sprawczość nie tylko jako opór, lecz także jako kultywowanie cnót; później pokazała, jak świeckie państwo kształtuje mniejszości religijne w Egipcie.
Kluczowe idee
- Sprawczość poza oporem
- Etyczne kształtowanie siebie
- Krytyka sekularyzmu
- Różnica religijna w wieku świeckim
Wpływ
Pod wpływem 3
Michel Foucault
pod wpływem
Mahmood used Foucault’s late work on ethics as practices of self-formation to analyse how women in Cairo’s mosque movement cultivate piety through bodily discipline (Politics of Piety, 2005). S. Mahmood, Politics of Piety (2005); M. Foucault, L’usage des plaisirs (1984); SEP “Michel Foucault”
Źródło: szkic AI
Michel Foucault › 1926–1984
Talal Asad
pod wpływem ✓
Mahmood built Politics of Piety (2005) on Asad’s concept of Islam as a discursive tradition and on his account of embodied practice and the formation of virtue. S. Mahmood, Politics of Piety (2005); T. Asad, The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam (1986); Scott and Hirschkind 2006
Źródło: także w Wikidanych · Wikidata
Talal Asad › ur. 1932
Judith Butler
pod wpływem
Mahmood took up Butler’s performativity, in which norms are inhabited through repeated bodily acts, but argued that Butler still tied agency to subverting norms (Politics of Piety, 2005). S. Mahmood, Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject (2005); J. Butler, Bodies That Matter (1993)
Źródło: szkic AI
Judith Butler › ur. 1956
Dzieła
Badania terenowe z ruchem kobiecych meczetów w Kairze: kobiety te kultywują cnoty przez praktykę cielesną, a by je zrozumieć, teoria feministyczna musi oddzielić sprawczość od pragnienia wolności i oporu.
Sytuacja Koptów i bahaitów w Egipcie pokazuje, że nowoczesne świeckie państwo nie stoi ponad religią, lecz ją reguluje, i w ten sposób zaostrza konflikty między większościami a mniejszościami.
Stanowisko
“Politics of Piety” (2005) studies women in Cairo who met in mosques to study the Qur’an and to cultivate pious virtues such as modesty and patience through repeated bodily practice. Liberal and feminist theory, Mahmood argued, tends to recognise agency only where people resist norms or express their own autonomous will; it therefore cannot understand women who seek to inhabit norms rather than overthrow them. Drawing on Foucault’s late work on ethics as self-formation and on Talal Asad’s anthropology of religion, she proposed to understand agency as the capacity for action that particular relations of power and practice create. She took up Judith Butler’s theory of performativity, but argued that Butler’s emphasis on subversion still tied agency to resistance. In “Religious Reason and Secular Affect” (2009) she used the controversy over the Danish cartoons of the Prophet to show how secular assumptions shape what counts as injury. “Religious Difference in a Secular Age” (2016) examined Copts and Bahais in Egypt and argued that the modern secular state does not stand above religion but regulates it, and in doing so can sharpen the divide between majority and minorities. Critics asked whether her approach left room for judging coercion; Mahmood answered that understanding had to precede judgement.
Życie i kontekst
Saba Mahmood was born on 3 February 1962 in Quetta, Pakistan, and moved to the United States to study. She first studied architecture and urban planning at the University of Washington in Seattle and then took a doctorate in anthropology at Stanford University in 1998. From 1995 to 1997 she did fieldwork with the women’s mosque movement in Cairo. In 2004 she joined the University of California, Berkeley, where she became professor of anthropology and was also active in critical theory. With Talal Asad, Wendy Brown and Judith Butler she published “Is Critique Secular?” (2009), and she co-directed a research project on the politics of religious freedom. She died of pancreatic cancer in Berkeley on 10 March 2018, aged 56.
Dalsze główne dzieła
- Religious Reason and Secular Affect: An Incommensurable Divide? (in Is Critique Secular?, 2009)
- Politics of Religious Freedom (co-editor, 2015)
Stan na listopad 2026 · Źródła · Ulepsz tę stronę · Jak powstaje Agora