Work · Structuralism & Poststructuralism
The Differend
Conflicts with no common rule of judgment.
Introduction
Published in 1983, The Differend is written in numbered paragraphs interspersed with “notices” on Kant, Hegel, Levinas, Wittgenstein and others. A differend is a conflict that cannot be fairly settled because no rule of judgment applies to both parties: the wrong suffered by one side cannot even be expressed in the idiom of the tribunal. Lyotard’s opening example is the Holocaust denier Robert Faurisson, who demanded an eyewitness of a gas chamber – someone who could only have seen one by dying in it. The book analyses “phrases”, their “regimens” and the “genres of discourse” that link them, and asks philosophy to bear witness to differends rather than to resolve them.
Connections
Builds on
- Critique of Judgment1790 · Immanuel Kant
- Philosophical Investigations1953 · Ludwig Wittgenstein
More works by Jean-François Lyotard
Appears in
- Journey ‘Thinking after Auschwitz’ · Stop 8 of 10
As of November 2026 · Improve this page · How Agora is made